443-367-1333
Skip to main content
Complete Health Wellness GroupRooted in Wellness

When Your Insurance Reviews Your Therapy

Understanding Medical Necessity Reviews

A medical necessity review is when your insurance company evaluates whether your mental health treatment meets their criteria for "medically necessary" care. Understanding this process—what triggers it, what insurers are looking for, and how to respond if coverage is denied—can help you advocate effectively for your treatment.

What Is a Medical Necessity Review?

Understanding how insurers determine if therapy is covered

A medical necessity review is when your insurance company evaluates whether your mental health treatment meets their criteria for "medically necessary" care. This is one of the most common ways insurers manage costs while trying to ensure that covered services are clinically appropriate.

In simple terms, insurance doesn't pay for therapy just because it's helpful or you want it—they pay for therapy when it's treating a diagnosable mental health condition and helping you function better in daily life.

What "Medically Necessary" Typically Means

  • • You have a diagnosable mental health condition (DSM-5 diagnosis like Major Depressive Disorder, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, PTSD, etc.)
  • • Your symptoms cause significant functional impairment (affecting work, school, relationships, self-care, or safety)
  • • The treatment is clinically appropriate based on accepted standards of care
  • • The treatment is expected to improve your condition or prevent deterioration
  • • The level of care (outpatient therapy) is the least intensive setting appropriate for your needs

What Is Typically NOT Considered Medically Necessary

  • • Personal growth, life coaching, or general wellness counseling without a diagnosable condition
  • • Therapy after you've reached "maximum therapeutic benefit" or full remission
  • • "Maintenance therapy" when symptoms are stable and no longer impairing function
  • • Treatment for conditions explicitly excluded by your plan

Under MHPAEA

Under federal mental health parity laws, insurers must apply medical necessity criteria no more stringently to mental health than to medical/surgical services. If your plan routinely approves ongoing physical therapy or cardiac rehab without frequent reviews but requires you to re-justify therapy every 10 sessions, that may be a parity violation worth reporting.

Types of Medical Necessity Reviews

When and how insurance reviews your treatment

Prior Authorization (Before Treatment)

What it is: Your insurer requires approval before you receive certain services. Most commonly required for:

  • • Intensive outpatient programs (IOP)
  • • Partial hospitalization programs (PHP)
  • • Inpatient psychiatric hospitalization
  • • Residential treatment
  • • Psychological or neuropsychological testing
  • • High-frequency therapy (multiple sessions per week for certain diagnoses)

Important: Most plans do NOT require prior authorization for standard once-weekly outpatient therapy, but some do. Always verify with your insurer.

Timeline: Insurers typically must respond to prior authorization requests within 5-15 business days. For urgent requests, they must respond within 24-72 hours.

What happens if you don't get it: If prior authorization is required and not obtained, your claim may be denied entirely, leaving you responsible for the full cost.

Concurrent Review (During Treatment)

What it is: The insurer periodically reviews whether ongoing treatment remains medically necessary. This is increasingly common even for outpatient therapy.

How it works:

  • • Many plans use "soft caps"—they automatically approve a certain number of sessions (typically 20-30 per year)
  • • After that threshold, claims trigger a concurrent review
  • • Your therapist must submit a treatment update, progress notes summary, or engage in a peer-to-peer review with an insurance doctor
  • • The insurer either approves additional sessions or denies further coverage

Red flag: If your plan subjects mental health to concurrent review more frequently than comparable medical services (like ongoing physical therapy or diabetes management), that may be a parity issue.

Retrospective Review (After Treatment)

What it is: The insurer reviews claims after services have been provided and payment has been made.

Why it happens:

  • • Routine audits of provider billing patterns
  • • Investigation of potential fraud or abuse
  • • Random quality assurance reviews

What it means for you: If the insurer determines services weren't medically necessary upon retrospective review, they may deny the claim and demand a refund from the provider (in rare cases, hold you responsible for the balance, though many states prohibit this for properly documented services).

What Insurance Is Looking For

The criteria insurers use to evaluate medical necessity

1. Diagnostic Justification

What they check:

  • • Is there a valid DSM-5 diagnosis documented?
  • • Does the diagnosis code match the treatment provided?
  • • Is the diagnosis one the plan covers?

Example: A claim for therapy with only a "Z-code" (life circumstance code like Z63.0 "relationship distress") may be denied because Z-codes don't represent mental disorders—they describe problems that may be a focus of clinical attention but aren't diagnoses.

2. Functional Impairment

What they check:

  • • How do your symptoms affect your daily functioning?
  • • Can you work? Attend school? Maintain relationships? Care for yourself?
  • • Are there safety concerns?

What they want to see documented:

  • • Specific examples: "Patient has missed 5 days of work this month due to panic attacks"
  • • Measurable impairments: "Patient reports PHQ-9 score of 18 (moderately severe depression)"
  • • Changes over time: "Patient's GAD-7 score decreased from 15 to 9 over 8 weeks"

Documentation Matters

Your therapist's notes don't need to be shared with insurance in most cases, but they do need to document functional impairment and progress toward treatment goals in case of review. If your therapist documents only "patient feeling sad" versus "patient unable to get out of bed for work 3 days this week," the latter is much stronger evidence of medical necessity.

3. Treatment Goals and Progress

What they check:

  • • Are there specific, measurable treatment goals?
  • • Is the patient making progress toward those goals?
  • • If progress has plateaued, is there a clinical rationale for continuing therapy?

SMART Goals: Insurers increasingly expect goals to be Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound.

Weak goal:

"Improve mood"

Strong goal:

"Patient will report PHQ-9 score below 10 and return to full-time work schedule within 12 weeks"

4. The "Lack of Progress" Trap

One of the most common denial reasons is CO-50: Lack of Medical Necessity, often citing "lack of progress" or "maintenance care."

The problem: Insurers may deny coverage if:

  • • Symptom scores (PHQ-9, GAD-7, etc.) haven't improved after a set period (e.g., 3-6 months)
  • • Symptoms have improved significantly and the patient is stable

The catch-22:

  • • If you don't improve, they say therapy isn't working
  • • If you do improve, they say you're "cured" and don't need more therapy

What to do: Your therapist should document:

  • Why progress may be slower (complex trauma, comorbid conditions, social circumstances)
  • • That therapy is preventing relapse or managing chronic symptoms
  • • Specific risk of deterioration if therapy stops

What Happens During a Review

Understanding the steps and timeline

The Process

  1. 1. Trigger: Your therapist submits a claim that triggers a review (e.g., after 20 sessions, or for prior authorization)
  2. 2. Request for Information: The insurer contacts your therapist requesting:
    • Treatment plan
    • Current diagnosis
    • Symptom severity (often using standardized scales)
    • Progress notes summary (not usually full notes)
    • Treatment goals and progress toward them
  3. 3. Reviewer Evaluation: A clinician employed by or contracted with the insurer (often a psychologist, psychiatrist, or LCSW) reviews the submission against their medical necessity criteria
  4. 4. Decision: The insurer approves or denies coverage for additional sessions, typically in increments (e.g., 10 more sessions approved)

Peer-to-Peer Review

If the initial review results in a denial or reduction, your therapist can often request a peer-to-peer review—a phone call with the insurance company's reviewing clinician to discuss your case.

This is often more effective than written submissions because your therapist can:

  • • Provide clinical context and nuance
  • • Respond to the reviewer's specific concerns
  • • Explain why continued treatment is necessary

Your role: Ask your therapist if they'll do a peer-to-peer review if your treatment is denied. Many will, but not all.

Timeline

  • Standard reviews: 5-15 business days
  • Expedited reviews (urgent): 24-72 hours
  • Concurrent reviews during treatment: Often 3-7 days

If the insurer doesn't respond within the required timeframe, the request is typically deemed approved under state prompt payment laws.

If Your Treatment Is Denied

Your rights and how to appeal

Step 1: Understand Why

Request a detailed written explanation of the denial, including:

  • • The specific denial code (e.g., CO-50 for medical necessity)
  • • The clinical criteria used
  • • What evidence was lacking or insufficient

Step 2: Review Your Rights

Under federal law and most state laws, you have the right to:

  • Internal appeal: Ask your insurer to reconsider the decision
  • External review: Have an independent reviewer evaluate the case if the internal appeal fails
  • Expedited appeals: If your health could be seriously jeopardized by waiting

Timeline for appeals:

  • Internal appeal: You typically have 180 days from the denial date to file
  • Insurer's response: They must respond within 30 days (standard) or 72 hours (urgent)
  • External review: Available after internal appeal is exhausted or simultaneously for urgent cases

Step 3: Gather Support

Work with your therapist to:

  • • Request a peer-to-peer review if not already done
  • • Get a clinical support letter explaining why treatment is medically necessary
  • • Document functional impairment and progress (or why progress is slower than expected)
  • • Reference any safety concerns or risk of deterioration

Step 4: File an Appeal

What to include in your appeal letter:

  • • Your identifying information (name, member ID, claim number)
  • • Clear statement that you're appealing the denial
  • • The specific service denied (e.g., "outpatient psychotherapy, CPT 90834")
  • • Why you believe the denial is wrong (clinical necessity, parity violation, etc.)
  • • Supporting documentation from your therapist
  • • Request for specific action (approve X additional sessions, cover Y service)

Sample Appeal Language

"I am appealing the denial of coverage for outpatient therapy sessions with [Therapist Name]. I have been diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder (F32.1) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (F41.1). Despite the insurer's claim that I have reached 'maximum therapeutic benefit,' I continue to experience significant functional impairment including missed work days and difficulty maintaining relationships. My therapist has documented that discontinuing treatment at this time poses a significant risk of relapse. I am requesting approval for an additional 20 therapy sessions."

Step 5: Consider External Review

If your internal appeal is denied, you can request an external review by an independent review organization (IRO).

Key points:

  • • The IRO's decision is binding on the insurer
  • • You typically have 60 days after the internal appeal denial to request external review
  • • External reviews are particularly strong for medical necessity denials and experimental/investigational denials
  • • Many states report that external reviewers overturn insurer denials 30-50% of the time

Step 6: File a Complaint

If you believe your denial violates mental health parity laws or represents unfair practices:

  • Maryland residents: File with the Maryland Insurance Administration (MIA). The MIA has recovered over $42 million for consumers in 2025 through enforcement actions.
  • Employer plans (ERISA): File with the U.S. Department of Labor at 1-866-444-3272
  • Marketplace plans: File with CMS or your state insurance department

Don't Give Up

Many patients accept denials as final decisions. They're not. Appeals succeed frequently, especially when supported by clinical documentation. Your therapist is your advocate—work together to challenge denials that don't make clinical sense.

How to Advocate for Yourself

Proactive steps to protect your coverage

Before Treatment Starts

1. Verify coverage: Call your insurer and ask:

  • • "Do I need prior authorization for outpatient therapy?"
  • • "How many sessions can I have before a review is triggered?"
  • • "What medical necessity criteria do you use for mental health?"
  • • "Can I get a copy of those criteria?"

2. Understand your benefits: Read your Summary of Benefits and Coverage (SBC) and look for:

  • • Session limits or review triggers
  • • Prior authorization requirements
  • • Medical necessity language

3. Choose a therapist who understands insurance: Ask potential therapists:

  • • "Do you participate in peer-to-peer reviews if needed?"
  • • "How do you document treatment to support medical necessity?"
  • • "Have you successfully appealed denials with my insurance before?"

During Treatment

1. Track your progress: Keep your own notes on:

  • • How your symptoms affect daily life
  • • Changes you've noticed since starting therapy
  • • Specific examples of functional impairment or improvement

2. Discuss treatment goals: Work with your therapist to:

  • • Set specific, measurable goals
  • • Review progress every few months
  • • Update goals as needed

3. Ask questions: If your insurance is reviewing your treatment:

  • • "What information are they requesting?"
  • • "Do you think there's a risk they'll deny coverage?"
  • • "What can we do to strengthen the case?"

If Coverage Is Denied

  • Act quickly: Don't wait—appeal deadlines are strict
  • Get help: Many providers have billing specialists or patient advocates who can help with appeals
  • Document everything: Keep copies of all denial letters, EOBs, and correspondence; log phone calls
  • Be persistent: Many denials are reversed on appeal, but only if you appeal

Your Rights Under Parity Laws

Federal and Maryland protections

Federal Protections

Under MHPAEA and the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021:

  • • Medical necessity criteria for mental health must be comparable to criteria for medical/surgical care
  • • Insurers cannot apply concurrent review more stringently to mental health than to physical health
  • • You have the right to request a comparative analysis showing how the plan applies medical necessity reviews to mental health vs. medical care

Maryland-Specific Protections

Maryland residents have additional rights:

1. HB 848 / SB 474 (Adverse Decisions Act, effective 2025):

  • • Insurers must provide detailed reasons for adverse decisions
  • • Utilization review agents must:
    • Maintain dedicated phone/email for utilization review
    • Respond within specified timeframes
    • Post utilization review criteria on member and provider websites

2. Maryland Insurance Administration (MIA) oversight:

  • • The MIA actively enforces parity laws
  • • Consumer complaints trigger investigations
  • • The MIA has strong consumer protection authority

How to Identify Parity Violations

Ask these questions:

  • • Does your plan require more frequent reviews for mental health than for comparable ongoing medical treatment (physical therapy, cardiac rehab, diabetes management)?
  • • Does your plan have stricter medical necessity criteria for mental health?
  • • Does your plan deny mental health services for "maintenance care" while covering maintenance care for chronic medical conditions?

If the answer to any of these is "yes," you may have grounds for a parity complaint.

Request Comparative Analysis

Under federal law, you have the right to request the insurer's comparative analysis showing how they apply medical necessity criteria to mental health vs. medical/surgical care. They must provide this within 30 days. If they can't show that criteria are comparable, you have strong grounds for a complaint.

Common Denial Codes

CO-50: Lack of Medical Necessity

Most common denial. Often cited for "lack of progress" or "maintenance care." Request a peer-to-peer review where your provider can explain your case.

CO-16: Missing/Invalid Information

Usually a paperwork error, such as a missing telehealth modifier (GT or 95). Your provider should correct and resubmit.

CO-197: Prior Authorization Not Obtained

Prior authorization was required but not obtained. Request retroactive authorization if the service was urgent, or file an appeal.

CO-29: Filing Limit Expired

The claim was submitted too late (typically after 90-180 days). This is usually a provider billing issue, not your responsibility.

Key Takeaways

  • • Medical necessity reviews are allowed, but they must be fair and comparable to medical care
  • • Most denials cite "lack of medical necessity" (CO-50)—this is appealable
  • • Your therapist documents functional impairment and progress to support continued coverage
  • • You have strong appeal rights—internal appeal, external review, and parity complaints
  • • In Maryland, you have additional protections requiring transparency in utilization review
  • • Don't accept "no" as final—many denials are overturned on appeal